On the suggestion of a coworker who is my new Aggregator of Internet Arcana (sorry Chris), I finally checked out
StumbleUpon, a meta site that lets you list topics you are interested in, then suggests websites to you. You can refine the suggestions incrementally by rating any sites you view. You have to download a browser toolbar for that part. I assume it also aggregate
s all the feedback it gets from all its users to make its recommendations to me smarter.
My motivation was to discover new internet cartoons. I'm a faithful reader of
Natalie Dee,
Married to the Sea, and
XKCD. And when I run out of those I will begrudgingly read more mainstream cartoons like dilbert.
Icanhascheezburger also seems to fit my short attention span web humor need. But these heroic cartoonists have limited energy, and can only put out a comic a day. Even the distributed cat picture taggers can't keep it up over the weekend. I need more cartoons in my life.
So I downloaded StumbleUpon's toolbar and checked a few of the 'interest' boxes:
Activism, Books, Irony, Counterculture, Crafts, Investing, Music, etc. Here's what the first few clicks turned up:
4/4 awesomes. I'd say Stumbleupon rocks.
One thing that is interesting is the percentage of spam websites that appear in your 'stumbles'- it seems to be about 10%. I know there are lots of spam websites out there trying to shore up their ad click-through revenue and sneak up the google search results pages, but 10% seems high. Also interesting is that it sometimes takes me a click or two to realize the website is spam- the index of the site will look totally valid and believeable but when you click through to pages the site claims to be indexing you see ads. And not surprisingly the spam websites are a whole lot more readable than many of the mom-and-pop personal webpages.
No new fabulous nerd cartoons yet, but I'll keep stumbling.